WCAG Designing Information Architecture That Is Understandable to Everyone
Information architecture is the foundation of every digital user experience. It’s the invisible structure that determines whether a user can easily find what they’re looking for.
In the context of digital accessibility, designing information architecture has particular significance. It must serve everyone – regardless of their perceptual, motor, or cognitive abilities.
According to WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines), accessible information architecture is one that:
- Enables all users equal access to content and functionality.
- Is intuitive for people navigating the site using a screen reader.
- Is understandable for someone with cognitive dysfunctions.
- Is easy to navigate for users of assistive technologies.
Fundamentals of Information Architecture in the Context of Accessibility
Information architecture in the context of accessibility is more than just content organization. It encompasses several key elements:
- Hierarchical content structure: Information should be logically organized – from general to more detailed. Each level of hierarchy must be clearly marked and accessible to assistive technologies, such as screen readers.
- Navigation system: Navigation through the site should be consistent and predictable, regardless of whether the user is using a mouse, keyboard, or screen reader.
- Labeling system: Use consistent and understandable naming for interface elements. This will help both humans and assistive software.
- Search system: Provide alternative ways of finding information. This is particularly important for users who have difficulties with traditional navigation.
Perspective of User Diversity
When designing accessible information architecture, you must take into account the needs of different user groups. The table below shows how to adapt the design to specific needs.
Principles of Accessible Content Organization
Hierarchy and Structure
Proper content hierarchy forms the skeleton of accessible information architecture. To be effective, it should meet the following principles:
- Logical ordering of headings – use heading structure from H1 to H6 in a way that reflects the actual content hierarchy. Each page should have only one H1 heading, and subsequent levels should be used consistently, without skipping.
- Grouping related information – place content that is thematically related close together and mark it as groups. You can use ARIA regions, sections, or lists for this purpose, which will facilitate their interpretation by assistive technologies.
- Predictability of structure – similar types of pages (e.g., product subpages) should have a consistent structure. This way, a user who has learned to navigate one of them will be able to easily apply this knowledge to others.
Navigation Mechanisms
Accessible navigation is a system that works regardless of how the user interacts with the site. Key elements include:
- Main navigation menu – must be fully accessible from the keyboard, clearly marked for screen readers, and inform the user of their current location. The menu structure should be simple, preferably with a maximum of two levels of depth.
Example: main navigation menu
- Breadcrumbs – help users orient themselves where they are in the site structure. They are particularly important for people using screen readers who don’t see the visual context.
Example: Breadcrumbs
- Internal links and “skip links” – allow quick transition to the main content of the page, bypassing repetitive navigation elements. This is a basic function for users navigating the page in a linear fashion.
Example: skip link
- Site map – provides an alternative way to explore the site, particularly useful for users with cognitive difficulties or for those who prefer a holistic approach to information.
Example: Site map
Labeling and Communication
Effective labeling is key to communication between the designer and the user.
- Descriptive element labels – every interactive element should have a label that clearly defines its function. Instead of generic “Click here,” use descriptive labels, e.g., “Download annual report 2024 (PDF, 2MB)”.
- System messages and errors – must be formulated in clear and understandable language, without technical jargon. They should also suggest to the user how to solve the problem.
- Contextual help – user support should be available where it’s needed, without the need to leave the current view.
Design Patterns Supporting Accessibility
Responsive Design from an Accessibility Perspective
Responsive design in the context of accessibility means much more than just adapting to different screen sizes. It includes:
- Adaptive content hierarchy – on mobile devices, some elements may be hidden or moved, but the logical structure of the page must remain intact. Screen reader users must have access to all functionalities regardless of the device being used.
- Touch interaction areas – interactive elements, such as buttons, must have an appropriate size (minimum 44×44 pixels according to WCAG) and be properly spaced to prevent accidental clicks.
- Screen orientation – the interface should work in both portrait and landscape orientation without losing functionality or content.
Navigation Patterns
- Mega menu – an expandable menu with a rich structure can be accessible if properly programmed. Key is keyboard focus management and clear marking of the expanded/collapsed menu state.
Example: mega menu
Tabbed interface – a tabbed interface requires special attention to focus management and clear communication of which tab is active. Keyboard users must be able to move between them using arrows
Example: Tabbed interface
- Accordion – expandable content sections are useful, but their state (collapsed/expanded) must be communicated to assistive technologies.
Example: Accordion
- Infinite scroll vs. pagination – infinite scrolling can be problematic for screen reader users. Traditional pagination with clear indication of the current page is often a more accessible solution.
Przykład: Paginacja
Example: Pagination
Forms and Interactions
- Logical grouping of fields – related form fields should be grouped using the <fieldset> element with an appropriate <legend>. This helps users understand the relationships between fields.
- Real-time validation – error messages should appear in a way that doesn’t interrupt form completion, while being accessible to assistive technologies.
- Multi-step processes – long forms should be divided into logical stages. It’s important to clearly indicate progress and provide the ability to return to previous steps.
Testing and Validation of Architecture Accessibility
User Research Methods
- Tests with real users – testing with people who use assistive technologies daily is the most important validation method. Their perspective is invaluable.
- Tests with limitations – simulating various limitations (e.g., using only the keyboard) allows better understanding of the experiences of different user groups.
- User path analysis – mapping different ways of performing key tasks helps identify potential barriers in information architecture.
Validation Tools and Techniques
- Automatic audit tools – tools such as axe, WAVE, or Lighthouse can detect many accessibility problems, but won’t replace manual testing and usability evaluation.
- HTML structure validation – proper HTML semantics are fundamental. HTML validators help detect structural errors.
- Testing with CSS disabled – viewing the page without CSS styles allows evaluation of whether the content structure is logical and understandable.
- Contrast analysis – color contrast analysis tools help ensure content readability for all users.
Continuous Monitoring
- Integration with the development process – accessibility controls should be built into the content creation process from the beginning, not added at the end.
- Regular audits – information architecture evolves. Regular audits help detect problems before they become serious.
- User feedback – collecting feedback from users with disabilities is crucial for continuous accessibility improvement.
Challenges and Common Mistakes
Typical Pitfalls
When designing information architecture, it’s easy to fall into common mistakes that make the site difficult to use. Here are the most common:
- Excessive complexity – too many options at one navigation level can lead to chaos. Users with cognitive problems are particularly sensitive to this. Simplify!
- Inconsistent terminology – using different names for the same function in different places disorients users and burdens their memory. Stick to consistent naming.
- Hidden functionalities – elements activated only on mouse hover are invisible to users navigating the site using a keyboard. Always provide an alternative activation method.
- Lack of clear state indicators – users need to know where they are on the page and what’s happening when they perform an action. Messages about loading, errors, or success are crucial.
Conflict Between Aesthetics and Accessibility
A challenge often arises to combine modern, minimalist design with accessibility requirements. This is possible if you remember a few principles:
- Minimalism versus information – although minimalist interfaces look attractive, they can be problematic for users who need more guidance. The solution is showing additional information on demand (progressive disclosure).
- Animations and effects – dynamic elements can be attractive but pose a risk for people with epilepsy or attention disorders. Make sure users have control over animations, and effects don’t exceed flashing frequency limits.
- Information density – the key is finding a balance between clarity and complete information. Hierarchize content intelligently and offer different levels of detail.
Technical Problems
Even the best-designed architecture can fail due to technical problems:
- Compatibility with assistive technologies – different screen readers and browsers may interpret the same code differently. Testing on different platforms is essential to ensure your site works correctly for everyone.
- Performance versus accessibility – sometimes solutions improving accessibility can affect site performance. Choose those that are both accessible and efficient.
- Focus management in SPA applications – in single-page applications (SPA), you must pay special attention to ensure keyboard focus is properly managed, especially with dynamic content loading.
The Future of Accessible Information Architecture
Information architecture in the context of accessibility is a field that’s constantly evolving, driven by new technologies and evolving standards.
Emerging Technologies
- Artificial intelligence and personalization — AI can create adaptive interfaces that adjust to individual user needs. This may include automatic language simplification, content reorganization, or offering personalized navigation paths.
- Voice interfaces — open new possibilities for users with vision or motor limitations but require a new approach to information architecture in the context of voice interaction.
- Augmented and virtual reality — these technologies pose challenges for accessibility but simultaneously offer a chance to create more immersive and accessible experiences for some user groups.
Evolution of Standards
- WCAG 3.0 — the next generation of guidelines places greater emphasis on user outcomes than on specific technical solutions. This is a fundamental change that may affect how we think about designing information architecture.
- Cognitive accessibility — growing awareness of the needs of people with cognitive dysfunctions is driving the development of new design patterns and evaluation tools.
Summary and Best Practices
Designing accessible information architecture is a process that requires deep understanding of the diversity of human experiences and needs. Here are the key principles that should guide this process:
- Universality of design – solutions that help people with disabilities often improve the experience for all users. Clear content hierarchy, descriptive labels, or logical navigation structure serve everyone.
- Testing with real users – no automatic tool will replace the opinions and experiences of people who use assistive technologies daily. Their voice should be an integral part of the design process from the very beginning.
- Iteration and continuous improvement – accessibility is not a one-time task but a process. Information architecture must evolve with changing user needs and technology development.
- Team education – all members of the design team – from UX designers, through developers, to content managers – must understand how accessibility affects information architecture.
- Documentation and standards – well-documented design patterns and accessibility standards help maintain consistency and quality in the long term.
Accessible information architecture is the foundation of inclusive digital experiences. In the era of digitization, where access to information means access to opportunities, ensuring universal accessibility becomes not only a responsibility but also a strategic advantage. By designing for edge cases – for people with the greatest limitations – we create solutions that are simply better for everyone.
Need a design that will 100% meet user expectations? Contact us. We’ll be happy to help!
